A reminder that WAG is holding an open meeting to update residents on the current state of play at Ripley Village Hall on Thursday 1st June at 7.30pm
WAG gave an update to a packed East Horsley Village Hall audience on the forthcoming appeal hearing which is due to start on September 19th 2017 and run for 20 days. To see an abridged version of the presentation use this link 12 Apr 17 Horsley open meeting. The meeting was attended by Sir Paul Beresford MP and local borough and county councillors and candidates.
The appeal will be determined by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government currently Sajid Javid.
Here’s the latest information on the Guildford Local Plan proposed timetable.
20th April – GBC Special meeting of the Borough, Economy and Infrastructure Executive Advisory Board to discuss the proposed submission plan – then:
Further targeted public consultation in June-July 2017only asking for comments about the proposed changes to the plan.
- Submission to the planning inspectorate for Examination (Regulation 22) – December 2017
- Pre-examination meeting – February 2018
- Examination in public – hearings (Regulation 24) – April 2018
- Anticipated adoption (Regulation 26) – December 2018
- Update Policies Map – December 2018
WIPL have registered an appeal against the refusal by Guildford Borough Council for 2068 homes at Three Farms Meadows. Wisley Action Group and Ockham Parish Council have been granted Rule 6 status which allows us to cross-examine the applicant’s submissions.
The appeal is scheduled to take place in September 2017 in Guildford and is likely to last for almost three weeks
If you’d like to object but have little time download this file and complete your name and address and send to GBCLETTER OF OBJECTION 9th March
Please click on the link to see the presentation made in Horsley tonightWAG Horsley presentation 9th March 2016
WAG is pleased that the Inspector has thrown out the appeal on the temporary use of the site for filming. The Inspector concludes:
“On balance, I consider that the identified benefits of the proposal individually or in combination do not clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and the other identified harm. Consequently, very special circumstances do not exist and the proposal runs contrary to Section 9 of the Framework.”
see the full decision here 3133032 – Appeal Decision (3)
The Surrey Ad gets a response from Surrey County Council which throws the developer’s claim of “consented A3 access” into question Surrey Ad 22nd Jan
GBC has agreed WAG’s request for more time to study the additional 3000 pages of amended documentation. WAG expects to post a response before end February but understands from local councillors and the case officer that all representations made prior to the application going to Planning Committee will be taken into consideration